Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs PMAQX
FGSCX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs PMAQX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$26.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
FGSCX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. PMAQX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. FGSCX (5.17B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: PMAQX (0.20) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: FGSCX (30 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: PMAQX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.84 vs. PMAQX (-6.04). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 28.54 vs. FGSCX (-12.24).
| FGSCX | PMAQX | FGSCX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.59 | 331% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.59 | 336% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.899 | -0.426 | -1,621% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 30.8B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.84 | -6.04 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.46 | 34.07 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.24 | 28.54 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers