Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs VMGIX
FGSCX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs VMGIX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$28.38
Change+$0.34 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$114.54
Change+$0.96 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.45B
FGSCX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. VMGIX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and VMGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. FGSCX (4.65B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: VMGIX (0.51) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FGSCX (30 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: FGSCX (1500) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.14 vs. FGSCX (18.16). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. FGSCX (-2.06).
| FGSCX | VMGIX | FGSCX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.19 | 1,026% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.19 | 1,042% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.182 | 13.826 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 32.4B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 23.14 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.79 | 50.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.06 | 58.69 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.16 | 187.29 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers