Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGTKX vs FJAMX
FGTKX vs FJAMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGTKX vs. FJAMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGTKX is a Hold and FJAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGTKX has more cash in the bank: 31.1B vs. FJAMX (3.65B). FGTKX pays higher dividends than FJAMX: FGTKX (2.41) vs FJAMX (1.82). FGTKX was incepted earlier than FJAMX: FGTKX (8 years) vs FJAMX (7 years). FJAMX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FGTKX (0.36). FGTKX (16.00) and FJAMX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGTKX (0) and FJAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FJAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. FGTKX (6.33). FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.72 vs. FGTKX (18.67).
| FGTKX | FJAMX | FGTKX / FJAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.71 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.71 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.075 | 5.128 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1B | 3.65B | 852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 1.82 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 7.79 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.16 | 22.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.67 | 25.72 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement