Ad is loading...
FGTKX vs FVLSX
FGTKX vs FVLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGTKX vs. FVLSX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGTKX is a Hold and FVLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGTKX has more cash in the bank: 30.3B vs. FVLSX (73.9M). FVLSX pays higher dividends than FGTKX: FVLSX (2.72) vs FGTKX (2.47). FGTKX was incepted earlier than FVLSX: FGTKX (8 years) vs FVLSX (8 years). FGTKX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FVLSX (0.00). FVLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FGTKX (16.00). FGTKX (0) and FVLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FVLSX (5.86). FVLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.61 vs. FGTKX (26.11).
| FGTKX | FVLSX | FGTKX / FVLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.577 | 2.370 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.3B | 73.9M | 41,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.72 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 5.86 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.30 | 22.47 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.11 | 37.61 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...