FHB
Price
$24.08
Change
+$0.39 (+1.65%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.98B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NASB
Price
$35.60
Change
+$0.45 (+1.28%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
259.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHB vs NASB

Header iconFHB vs NASB Comparison
Open Charts FHB vs NASBBanner chart's image
First Hawaiian
Price$24.08
Change+$0.39 (+1.65%)
Volume$44.36K
Capitalization2.98B
NASB Financial
Price$35.60
Change+$0.45 (+1.28%)
Volume$750
Capitalization259.77M
FHB vs NASB Comparison Chart in %
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NASB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHB vs. NASB commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHB is a Hold and NASB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FHB: $24.08 vs. NASB: $35.60)
Brand notoriety: FHB and NASB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHB: 105% vs. NASB: 99%
Market capitalization -- FHB: $2.98B vs. NASB: $259.77M
FHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.98B. NASB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $259.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNASB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NASB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the long-term than NASB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NASB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NASB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NASB is a better buy in the short-term than FHB.

Price Growth

FHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while NASB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($2.98B) has a higher market cap than NASB($260M). FHB has higher P/E ratio than NASB: FHB (11.75) vs NASB (9.25). NASB YTD gains are higher at: -0.746 vs. FHB (-3.260). FHB has less debt than NASB: FHB (250M) vs NASB (651M). FHB has higher revenues than NASB: FHB (810M) vs NASB (86M).
FHBNASBFHB / NASB
Capitalization2.98B260M1,146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.260-0.746437%
P/E Ratio11.759.25127%
Revenue810M86M942%
Total Cash305MN/A-
Total Debt250M651M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHB vs NASB: Fundamental Ratings
FHB
NASB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
1451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NASB's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FHB (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NASB (100) in the null industry. This means that FHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NASB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NASB (51) in the null industry. This means that FHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NASB’s over the last 12 months.

NASB's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FHB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

NASB's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FHB (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHBNASB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NASB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEMVX14.41N/A
N/A
Causeway Emerging Markets Investor
NNTWX30.47N/A
N/A
Nicholas II N
TROIX15.65N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock I
RSSRX27.17N/A
N/A
Victory RS Select Growth R6
DFMGX36.22-0.08
-0.22%
DF Dent Midcap Growth Institutional

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
+1.65%
UBSI - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
FNB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
AUB - FHB
87%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
UCB - FHB
86%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
BOH - FHB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More

NASB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NASB and TFIN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NASB and TFIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NASB
1D Price
Change %
NASB100%
+1.12%
TFIN - NASB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
SSB - NASB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
FHB - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
TCBI - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
WBS - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More