Ad is loading...
FHEQX vs RSLBX
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FHEQX vs RSLBX
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
Price$12.28
Change-$0.66 (-5.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.87M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.57
Change-$2.46 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. FHEQX (94.9M). FHEQX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHEQX (1.11) vs RSLBX (0.02). FHEQX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHEQX (5 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FHEQX (1.51). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FHEQX (19.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHEQX: RSLBX (250) vs FHEQX (1500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.77 vs. FHEQX (-9.16). FHEQX return over 5 years is better than : 76.15 vs. RSLBX (42.96).
| FHEQX | RSLBX | FHEQX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.75 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.75 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.527 | -5.244 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.9M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.02 | 5,470% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.16 | -5.77 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.18 | -8.08 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.15 | 42.96 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.93 | - |