Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQX vs RSLBX
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FHEQX vs RSLBX
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
Price$14.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.15B
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. FHEQX (101M). FHEQX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHEQX (0.99) vs RSLBX (0.06). FHEQX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHEQX (6 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FHEQX (1.51). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FHEQX (19.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHEQX: RSLBX (250) vs FHEQX (1500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. FHEQX (-1.39). FHEQX return over 5 years is better than : 36.94 vs. RSLBX (5.93).
| FHEQX | RSLBX | FHEQX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.75 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.75 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.643 | 11.902 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 82.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.06 | 1,774% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.39 | 8.19 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.26 | 41.50 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.94 | 5.93 | 623% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement