Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQX vs RSLCX
FHEQX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts FHEQX vs RSLCX
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
Price$13.40
Change-$0.07 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.7M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
Price$67.78
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
FHEQX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQX vs. RSLCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQX is a Hold and RSLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. FHEQX (94.7M). FHEQX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: FHEQX (1.02) vs RSLCX (0.38). FHEQX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: FHEQX (6 years) vs RSLCX (23 years). FHEQX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RSLCX (1.30). RSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FHEQX (19.00). RSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHEQX: RSLCX (250) vs FHEQX (1500). RSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. FHEQX (-4.04). FHEQX return over 5 years is better than : 18.69 vs. RSLCX (-0.33).
| FHEQX | RSLCX | FHEQX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.30 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.30 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.253 | 7.883 | -16% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.7M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.38 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.04 | 5.70 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.52 | 28.32 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.69 | -0.33 | -5,653% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers