Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs FSNKX
FHFEX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. FSNKX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. FHFEX (155M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: FSNKX (2.95) vs FHFEX (2.65). FHFEX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FHFEX (7 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FSNKX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSNKX (14.00). FHFEX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. FSNKX (6.40). FHFEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.28 vs. FSNKX (6.01).
| FHFEX | FSNKX | FHFEX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.42 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.42 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 5.630 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 3.12B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.95 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 6.40 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.75 | 17.78 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 6.01 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement