Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs FSNKX
FHFEX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. FSNKX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FHFEX (152M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: FSNKX (3.02) vs FHFEX (2.71). FHFEX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FHFEX (7 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FSNKX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSNKX (13.00). FHFEX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FSNKX (5.78). FHFEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.90 vs. FSNKX (6.71).
| FHFEX | FSNKX | FHFEX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.257 | 3.610 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 3.11B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 5.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 13.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 6.71 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement