Ad is loading...
FHFEX vs FSNKX
FHFEX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. FSNKX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FHFEX (154M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: FSNKX (2.98) vs FHFEX (2.83). FHFEX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FHFEX (7 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FSNKX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSNKX (13.00). FHFEX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHFEX (7.53) and FSNKX (7.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FHFEX return over 5 years is better than : 14.10 vs. FSNKX (8.02).
| FHFEX | FSNKX | FHFEX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.508 | 2.443 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 3.11B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.98 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.51 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.52 | 8.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.10 | 8.02 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |