Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs RBATX
FHFEX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. RBATX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FHFEX (152M). FHFEX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FHFEX (2.71) vs RBATX (2.10). FHFEX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FHFEX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX (8.12) and FHFEX (8.04) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. FHFEX (14.73).
| FHFEX | RBATX | FHFEX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.865 | 6.457 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 3.91B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 2.10 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 8.12 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 17.30 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.73 | 19.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers