Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs RBATX
FHFEX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. RBATX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.88B vs. FHFEX (155M). FHFEX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FHFEX (2.65) vs RBATX (2.05). FHFEX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs RBATX (19 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FHFEX (0) vs RBATX (250). FHFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. RBATX (6.16). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 16.11 vs. FHFEX (11.28).
| FHFEX | RBATX | FHFEX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 6.894 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 3.88B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.05 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 6.16 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.75 | 15.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 16.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement