Ad is loading...
FHFEX vs RBATX
FHFEX vs RBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. RBATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. FHFEX (154M). FHFEX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FHFEX (2.83) vs RBATX (2.14). FHFEX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FHFEX (0) vs RBATX (250). FHFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.40 vs. RBATX (7.58). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 18.95 vs. FHFEX (15.36).
| FHFEX | RBATX | FHFEX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.708 | 2.618 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 3.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.14 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 7.58 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 9.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.36 | 18.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...