Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs RBATX
FHFEX vs RBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. RBATX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. FHFEX (152M). FHFEX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FHFEX (2.71) vs RBATX (2.10). FHFEX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FHFEX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX (6.53) and FHFEX (6.50) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 14.87 vs. FHFEX (11.90).
| FHFEX | RBATX | FHFEX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.257 | 4.625 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 3.85B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 2.10 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 6.53 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 10.34 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 14.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement