Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs RBATX
FHFEX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. RBATX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.92B vs. FHFEX (157M). FHFEX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FHFEX (2.61) vs RBATX (2.02). FHFEX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs RBATX (19 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FHFEX (0) vs RBATX (250). FHFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. RBATX (6.70). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 17.12 vs. FHFEX (12.34).
| FHFEX | RBATX | FHFEX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.38 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.580 | 9.162 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 3.92B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 6.70 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.50 | 20.73 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.34 | 17.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement