Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs REATX
FHFEX vs REATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. REATX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and REATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REATX has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. FHFEX (152M). REATX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: REATX (3.10) vs FHFEX (2.71). FHFEX was incepted earlier than REATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs REATX (18 years). REATX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. REATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than REATX: FHFEX (0) vs REATX (250). REATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. FHFEX (6.50). REATX return over 5 years is better than : 20.06 vs. FHFEX (11.90).
| FHFEX | REATX | FHFEX / REATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.257 | 5.051 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 3.85B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 7.71 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 13.32 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 20.06 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement