Ad is loading...
FHFEX vs REATX
FHFEX vs REATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. REATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and REATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REATX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. FHFEX (154M). REATX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: REATX (3.17) vs FHFEX (2.83). FHFEX was incepted earlier than REATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs REATX (18 years). REATX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. REATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than REATX: FHFEX (0) vs REATX (250). REATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. FHFEX (8.40). REATX return over 5 years is better than : 24.37 vs. FHFEX (15.36).
| FHFEX | REATX | FHFEX / REATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.708 | 2.997 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 3.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 8.84 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 12.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.36 | 24.37 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...