Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFEX vs REATX
FHFEX vs REATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFEX vs. REATX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFEX is a Hold and REATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REATX has more cash in the bank: 3.88B vs. FHFEX (155M). REATX pays higher dividends than FHFEX: REATX (3.03) vs FHFEX (2.65). FHFEX was incepted earlier than REATX: FHFEX (7 years) vs REATX (19 years). REATX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FHFEX (0.31). FHFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. REATX (8.00). FHFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than REATX: FHFEX (0) vs REATX (250). REATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. FHFEX (6.95). REATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.30 vs. FHFEX (11.28).
| FHFEX | REATX | FHFEX / REATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 7.534 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 3.88B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.03 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 7.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.75 | 18.12 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 21.30 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement