Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHFTX vs RBMTX
FHFTX vs RBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHFTX vs. RBMTX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHFTX is a Hold and RBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBMTX has more cash in the bank: 26B vs. FHFTX (1.26B). FHFTX pays higher dividends than RBMTX: FHFTX (0.88) vs RBMTX (0.22). FHFTX was incepted earlier than RBMTX: FHFTX (14 years) vs RBMTX (15 years). RBMTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FHFTX (1.25). FHFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RBMTX (5.00). FHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBMTX: FHFTX (0) vs RBMTX (250). RBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.16 vs. FHFTX (7.16). RBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.73 vs. FHFTX (34.85).
| FHFTX | RBMTX | FHFTX / RBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.098 | 5.571 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 26B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.22 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 10.16 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 24.49 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.85 | 38.73 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.75 | 68.50 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement