Ad is loading...
FHGDF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
LTCH
Price
$0.84
Change
+$0.44 (+110.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

FHGDF vs LTCH

Header iconFHGDF vs LTCH Comparison
Open Charts FHGDF vs LTCHBanner chart's image
Founder Holdings
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Latch
Price$0.84
Change+$0.44 (+110.00%)
Volume$32.23K
CapitalizationN/A
FHGDF vs LTCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
LTCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHGDF vs. LTCH commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHGDF is a Hold and LTCH is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FHGDF: $0.09 vs. LTCH: $0.84)
Brand notoriety: FHGDF and LTCH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHGDF: 34% vs. LTCH: 31%
Market capitalization -- FHGDF: $103.09M vs. LTCH: $143.64M
FHGDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $103.09M. LTCH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $143.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTCH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LTCH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LTCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTCH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LTCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FHGDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LTCH (@Packaged Software) price change was +170.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LTCH is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTCH($144M) has a higher market cap than FHGDF($103M). FHGDF YTD gains are higher at: 131.512 vs. LTCH (25.373). FHGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. LTCH (-153.04M). FHGDF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. LTCH (264M). FHGDF has higher revenues than LTCH: FHGDF (942M) vs LTCH (48.4M).
FHGDFLTCHFHGDF / LTCH
Capitalization103M144M72%
EBITDA15.6M-153.04M-10%
Gain YTD131.51225.373518%
P/E Ratio21.55N/A-
Revenue942M48.4M1,946%
Total Cash444M264M168%
Total Debt5.57MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTCH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LTCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGIH1.630.04
+2.52%
Millennium Group International Holdings Limited
SBRA18.180.24
+1.34%
Sabra Health Care REIT
WLK126.66-0.03
-0.02%
Westlake Corp
SSTI11.43-0.09
-0.78%
SoundThinking
BRKL12.41-0.10
-0.84%
Brookline Bancorp

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and ATEN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and ATEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
ATEN - FHGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
SYT - FHGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
ISGIF - FHGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDAY - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
LTCH - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+110.00%
More

LTCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTCH has been loosely correlated with MLNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTCH jumps, then MLNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTCH
1D Price
Change %
LTCH100%
+110.00%
MLNK - LTCH
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
RIOT - LTCH
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
CLSK - LTCH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
COIN - LTCH
39%
Loosely correlated
+9.69%
AVPT - LTCH
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More