FHGDF vs SYT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHGDF is a Hold and SYT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FHGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSYT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SYT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FHGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FHGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SYT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FHGDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SYT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FHGDF | SYT | FHGDF / SYT | |
| Capitalization | 103M | 81.1M | 127% |
| EBITDA | 15.6M | 1.09B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 16.727 | -18.250 | -92% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.55 | 17.01 | 127% |
| Revenue | 942M | 22.1B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 444M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.57M | N/A | - |
FHGDF | SYT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 54 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SYT's Valuation (10) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as FHGDF (42) in the null industry. This means that SYT’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.
FHGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SYT (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than SYT’s over the last 12 months.
FHGDF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SYT (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to SYT’s over the last 12 months.
FHGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYT (88) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYT’s over the last 12 months.
FHGDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SYT (37) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to SYT’s over the last 12 months.
| FHGDF | SYT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 39% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 43% | 11 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 11 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 49% | 11 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 25% | 19 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
FHGDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and ATEN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and ATEN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHGDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHGDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ATEN - FHGDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
| SYT - FHGDF | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.22% | ||
| ISGIF - FHGDF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WDAY - FHGDF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| LTCH - FHGDF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SYT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYT has been loosely correlated with SOPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYT jumps, then SOPA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SYT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYT | 100% | +5.22% | ||
| SOPA - SYT | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| GRRR - SYT | 46% Loosely correlated | -9.77% | ||
| ATEN - SYT | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| RDZN - SYT | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.18% | ||
| FHGDF - SYT | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||