FHGDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
103.09M
SYT
Price
$2.39
Change
-$0.03 (-1.24%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
81.14M
Ad is loading...

FHGDF vs SYT

Header iconFHGDF vs SYT Comparison
Open Charts FHGDF vs SYTBanner chart's image
Founder Holdings
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization103.09M
SYLA Technologies
Price$2.39
Change-$0.03 (-1.24%)
Volume$5.28K
Capitalization81.14M
FHGDF vs SYT Comparison Chart
Loading...
SYT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHGDF vs. SYT commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHGDF is a Hold and SYT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FHGDF: $0.10 vs. SYT: $2.39)
Brand notoriety: FHGDF and SYT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHGDF: 109% vs. SYT: 82%
Market capitalization -- FHGDF: $103.09M vs. SYT: $81.14M
FHGDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $103.09M. SYT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $81.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSYT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SYT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the long-term than SYT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SYT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SYT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FHGDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SYT (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHGDF($103M) has a higher market cap than SYT($81.1M). FHGDF has higher P/E ratio than SYT: FHGDF (21.55) vs SYT (17.01). SYT YTD gains are higher at: 19.500 vs. FHGDF (-10.072). SYT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.09B vs. FHGDF (15.6M). SYT has higher revenues than FHGDF: SYT (22.1B) vs FHGDF (942M).
FHGDFSYTFHGDF / SYT
Capitalization103M81.1M127%
EBITDA15.6M1.09B1%
Gain YTD-10.07219.500-52%
P/E Ratio21.5517.01127%
Revenue942M22.1B4%
Total Cash444MN/A-
Total Debt5.57MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHGDF vs SYT: Fundamental Ratings
FHGDF
SYT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SYT's Valuation (12) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHGDF (51) in the null industry. This means that SYT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYT (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYT’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SYT (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to SYT’s over the last 12 months.

SYT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as FHGDF (41) in the null industry. This means that SYT’s stock grew similarly to FHGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FHGDF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SYT (14) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FHGDF’s stock grew similarly to SYT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SYT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SYT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOOT107.733.39
+3.25%
Boot Barn Holdings
APDN0.910.03
+3.02%
Applied DNA Sciences Inc
BEN18.74-0.02
-0.11%
Franklin Resources
AC35.06-1.06
-2.93%
Associated Capital Group
PBYI3.08-0.10
-3.14%
Puma Biotechnology

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and ATEN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and ATEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
ATEN - FHGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
SYT - FHGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
ISGIF - FHGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDAY - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
LTCH - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SYT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYT has been loosely correlated with SOPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYT jumps, then SOPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYT
1D Price
Change %
SYT100%
-1.24%
SOPA - SYT
50%
Loosely correlated
+42.86%
GRRR - SYT
46%
Loosely correlated
-11.31%
CCLDP - SYT
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDZN - SYT
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
ATEN - SYT
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More