FHI
Price
$53.10
Change
-$0.51 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
54 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.52
Change
-$0.17 (-0.91%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.17B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHI vs OWL

Header iconFHI vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts FHI vs OWLBanner chart's image
Federated Hermes
Price$53.10
Change-$0.51 (-0.95%)
Volume$594.68K
Capitalization4.12B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.52
Change-$0.17 (-0.91%)
Volume$5.95M
Capitalization12.17B
FHI vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHI vs. OWL commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHI is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FHI: $53.10 vs. OWL: $18.52)
Brand notoriety: FHI and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHI: 95% vs. OWL: 88%
Market capitalization -- FHI: $4.12B vs. OWL: $12.17B
FHI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.12B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than FHI.

Price Growth

FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.19% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($12.2B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.12B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than FHI: OWL (168.36) vs FHI (11.77). FHI YTD gains are higher at: 32.126 vs. OWL (-17.945). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. FHI (537M). FHI has more cash in the bank: 607M vs. OWL (118M). FHI has less debt than OWL: FHI (461M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than FHI: OWL (2.62B) vs FHI (1.68B).
FHIOWLFHI / OWL
Capitalization4.12B12.2B34%
EBITDA537M804M67%
Gain YTD32.126-17.945-179%
P/E Ratio11.77168.367%
Revenue1.68B2.62B64%
Total Cash607M118M514%
Total Debt461M3.65B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHIOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBIY31.800.22
+0.68%
WBI Power Factor® High Dividend ETF
PAPI26.240.04
+0.14%
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
FLGV20.56N/A
+0.02%
Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
QMID28.47N/A
N/A
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
RDTL58.31-0.19
-0.33%
GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
-0.95%
SEIC - FHI
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
APAM - FHI
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
STT - FHI
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
AMG - FHI
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
TROW - FHI
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More