It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.89% price change this week, while PFG (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.04%.
FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.
PFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
|FHI||PFG||FHI / PFG|
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
PRICE GROWTH RATING
P/E GROWTH RATING
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFG's Valuation (19) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FHI (24) in the null industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.
FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.
FHI's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.
PFG's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FHI (57) in the null industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.
PFG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (67) in the null industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.
3 days ago61%
3 days ago63%
3 days ago73%
3 days ago76%
3 days ago59%
3 days ago58%
3 days ago50%
3 days ago65%
3 days ago53%
3 days ago61%
3 days ago47%
3 days ago55%
9 days ago71%
15 days ago64%
3 days ago56%
3 days ago66%
3 days ago82%
3 days ago72%
3 days ago70%
3 days ago56%
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been loosely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.