Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs FHKIX
FHKAX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs FHKIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$48.09
Change+$0.96 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$48.46
Change+$0.97 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
FHKAX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. FHKIX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX (1.31B) and FHKIX (1.31B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKIX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: FHKIX (1.21) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: FHKAX (17 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). FHKAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKAX (30.00) and FHKIX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKAX (0) and FHKIX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKIX (34.94) and FHKAX (34.58) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.83 vs. FHKAX (2.22).
| FHKAX | FHKIX | FHKAX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.90 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.90 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.365 | 25.609 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 1.31B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.58 | 34.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.48 | 53.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.22 | 3.83 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.90 | 102.02 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement