Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSACX
FHKAX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.03
Change+$0.13 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.19
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.68M
FHKAX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSACX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSACX (36.7M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKAX (1.02) vs GSACX (0.28). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKAX (0) vs GSACX (1000). GSACX (37.23) and FHKAX (35.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.01 vs. GSACX (-34.47).
| FHKAX | GSACX | FHKAX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.21 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.05 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.656 | 17.637 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.7M | 3,556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.28 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.54 | 37.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.35 | -2.49 | -1,703% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.01 | -34.47 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.91 | 3.81 | 1,363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement