Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSACX
FHKAX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$48.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$21.12
Change+$0.24 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
FHKAX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSACX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSACX (37.7M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKAX (1.02) vs GSACX (0.28). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKAX (0) vs GSACX (1000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.11 vs. FHKAX (35.51). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.29 vs. GSACX (-35.03).
| FHKAX | GSACX | FHKAX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.21 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 3.05 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.974 | 22.751 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 37.7M | 3,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.28 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.51 | 39.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.84 | 3.41 | 1,462% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.29 | -35.03 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.94 | 17.75 | 495% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement