Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAFX
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$55.39
Change-$0.48 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$29.59
Change-$0.24 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.57M
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSAFX (42.6M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GSAFX (1.15) vs FHKAX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKAX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.97 vs. GSAFX (18.49). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.88 vs. GSAFX (-20.73).
| FHKAX | GSAFX | FHKAX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.09 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.647 | 41.040 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 42.6M | 3,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.15 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.97 | 18.49 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.82 | 42.17 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.88 | -20.73 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement