Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAIX
FHKAX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$55.87
Change+$0.31 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$29.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.46M
FHKAX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAIX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSAIX (42.5M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GSAIX (1.14) vs FHKAX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKAX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.01 vs. GSAIX (21.82). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.83 vs. GSAIX (-20.35).
| FHKAX | GSAIX | FHKAX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.10 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.838 | 40.631 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 42.5M | 3,758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.14 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.01 | 21.82 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.71 | 41.74 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.83 | -20.35 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.52 | 48.99 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement