Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.73
Change-$0.57 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.23M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MCSMX (68.2M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.04) vs FHKAX (0.85). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.37 vs. MCSMX (26.71). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.22 vs. MCSMX (-43.58).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.461 | 24.890 | 151% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 68.2M | 2,658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.37 | 26.71 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 10.45 | 736% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.22 | -43.58 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.09 | 31.07 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement