Ad is loading...
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$36.59
Change-$0.19 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$8.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Sell and MCSMX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. MCSMX (64.3M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (2.41) vs FHKAX (1.51). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (16 years) vs MCSMX (13 years). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. FHKAX (24.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.55 vs. MCSMX (-14.50). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.54 vs. MCSMX (-27.63).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.791 | -9.609 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 64.3M | 1,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.55 | -14.50 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.79 | -57.60 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | -27.63 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.63 | -7.30 | -146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...