Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$55.39
Change-$0.48 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.19
Change-$0.07 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MCSMX (72.7M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.01) vs FHKAX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.97 vs. MCSMX (17.00). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.88 vs. MCSMX (-38.63).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.647 | 35.022 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 72.7M | 2,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.97 | 17.00 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.82 | 27.41 | 364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.88 | -38.63 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.64 | 51.34 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement