Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs TCELX
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs TCELX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.73
Change-$0.57 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$13.88
Change-$0.15 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.48M
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. TCELX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. TCELX (62.5M). TCELX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: TCELX (1.09) vs FHKAX (0.85). FHKAX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKAX (18 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKAX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.37 vs. TCELX (28.96). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.94 vs. TCELX (-10.38).
| FHKAX | TCELX | FHKAX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.67 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.947 | 29.116 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 62.5M | 2,901% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.37 | 28.96 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.81 | 27.73 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.94 | -10.38 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement