Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs FHKTX
FHKCX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs FHKTX
Fidelity China Region
Price$49.70
Change+$1.00 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$47.48
Change-$0.47 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FHKCX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. FHKTX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX (1.39B) and FHKTX (1.39B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKCX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: FHKCX (1.11) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKCX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: FHKCX (30 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX (30.00) and FHKTX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKCX (0) and FHKTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.88 vs. FHKTX (37.32). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.67 vs. FHKTX (-0.55).
| FHKCX | FHKTX | FHKCX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 24.783 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 1.39B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.88 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.88 | 37.32 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 55.19 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | -0.55 | -853% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.90 | 86.83 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement