Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GMEPX
FHKCX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GMEPX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.58
Change-$0.58 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$27.93
Change-$0.09 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.95M
FHKCX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GMEPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and GMEPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GMEPX (40.9M). GMEPX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GMEPX (1.19) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GMEPX (8 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX (0) and GMEPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.74 vs. GMEPX (31.99). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. GMEPX (-30.24).
| FHKCX | GMEPX | FHKCX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.265 | 32.420 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.9M | 4,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.19 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 31.99 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.35 | 32.92 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | -30.24 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement