Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAGX
FHKCX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAGX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.19
Change+$0.65 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.24
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
FHKCX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAGX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAGX (40.3M). FHKCX (1.11) and GSAGX (1.10) have matching dividends . FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.52 vs. FHKCX (47.44). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.25 vs. GSAGX (-23.56).
| FHKCX | GSAGX | FHKCX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.30 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.099 | 33.282 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 40.3M | 3,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.44 | 52.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.62 | 25.08 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | -23.56 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.78 | 38.27 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement