Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAGX
FHKCX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAGX
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.15
Change-$0.15 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$23.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.04M
FHKCX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAGX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAGX (36M). GSAGX (1.19) and FHKCX (1.17) have matching dividends . FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.54 vs. FHKCX (32.57). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.79 vs. GSAGX (-30.53).
| FHKCX | GSAGX | FHKCX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.30 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.239 | 18.836 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36M | 3,625% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.19 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.57 | 36.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.19 | 0.89 | 5,290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.79 | -30.53 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.31 | 16.07 | 350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement