Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAIX
FHKCX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAIX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.37
Change-$0.21 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$27.89
Change-$0.14 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.82M
FHKCX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and GSAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAIX (40.8M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GSAIX (1.18) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.70 vs. GSAIX (31.65). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.38 vs. GSAIX (-31.36).
| FHKCX | GSAIX | FHKCX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.10 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.773 | 31.968 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.8M | 4,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.18 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.70 | 31.65 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.42 | 32.46 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.38 | -31.36 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.39 | 35.98 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement