Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs ICHKX
FHKCX vs ICHKX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs ICHKX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.75
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.19
Change-$0.17 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.19M
FHKCX vs ICHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. ICHKX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and ICHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. ICHKX (27.2M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: FHKCX (0.98) vs ICHKX (0.86). FHKCX was incepted earlier than ICHKX: FHKCX (30 years) vs ICHKX (31 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ICHKX (8.63). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: FHKCX (0) vs ICHKX (5000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.17 vs. ICHKX (25.68). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.29 vs. ICHKX (-30.28).
| FHKCX | ICHKX | FHKCX / ICHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.579 | 27.080 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 27.2M | 5,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.86 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.17 | 25.68 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.26 | 23.27 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.29 | -30.28 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | -21.90 | -424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement