Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.70
Change-$0.48 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.38
Change-$0.75 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.47M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LNGZX (50.5M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKCX (1.11) vs LNGZX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.31 vs. FHKCX (39.95). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.57 vs. LNGZX (-34.73).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.459 | 27.828 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 50.5M | 2,743% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.96 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.95 | 47.31 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.05 | 14.96 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.57 | -34.73 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.97 | 39.76 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement