Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$42.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.05M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. LNGZX (48.1M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKCX (1.39) vs LNGZX (1.13). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.77 vs. FHKCX (14.44). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.50 vs. LNGZX (-20.03).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.923 | 15.785 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 48.1M | 2,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.44 | 16.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.69 | 2.10 | 1,506% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | -20.03 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.87 | -9.48 | -146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers