Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$44.93
Change-$0.34 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.68M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a StrongBuy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. LNGZX (49.7M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKCX (1.22) vs LNGZX (1.05). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.19 vs. FHKCX (33.96). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.27 vs. LNGZX (-31.82).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.522 | 22.783 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 49.7M | 2,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.05 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.96 | 40.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.38 | 2.87 | 1,514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.27 | -31.82 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.28 | 11.17 | 522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement