Ad is loading...
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$38.71
Change+$0.29 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$39.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. LNGZX (44.9M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKCX (1.33) vs LNGZX (1.07). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FHKCX (14.44). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.11 vs. LNGZX (-25.15).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.209 | 6.916 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 44.9M | 2,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.07 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.44 | 19.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | -2.58 | -811% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.11 | -25.15 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.65 | -17.46 | -27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...