Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICDX
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICDX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.58
Change-$0.58 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MICDX (99.3M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICDX (2.93) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKCX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.70 vs. MICDX (33.30). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.38 vs. MICDX (-6.68).
| FHKCX | MICDX | FHKCX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.773 | 31.065 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 99.3M | 1,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.93 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.70 | 33.30 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.42 | 29.64 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.38 | -6.68 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.39 | 38.59 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement