Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICFX
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.97
Change+$0.25 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MICFX (456M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICFX (1.51) vs FHKCX (1.00). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKCX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.34 vs. MICFX (28.93). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.00 vs. MICFX (-31.76).
| FHKCX | MICFX | FHKCX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.776 | 30.253 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 456M | 381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.34 | 28.93 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.75 | 23.41 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.00 | -31.76 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.21 | -12.83 | -719% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement