Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs NGCAX
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs NGCAX
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$41.28
Change+$0.23 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. NGCAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. NGCAX (50.8M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKCX (1.17) vs NGCAX (0.93). FHKCX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKCX (30 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKCX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.76 vs. FHKCX (35.88). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. NGCAX (-39.73).
| FHKCX | NGCAX | FHKCX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.199 | 23.459 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 50.8M | 2,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.93 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.88 | 42.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.10 | 6.89 | 741% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | -39.73 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.31 | 25.18 | 363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement