Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs OBCHX
FHKCX vs OBCHX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs OBCHX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.58
Change-$0.58 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Oberweis China Opportunities
Price$9.60
Change-$0.16 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.2M
FHKCX vs OBCHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. OBCHX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and OBCHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. OBCHX (53.2M). OBCHX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: OBCHX (1.50) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than OBCHX: FHKCX (30 years) vs OBCHX (20 years). OBCHX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). OBCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than OBCHX: FHKCX (0) vs OBCHX (1000). OBCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.44 vs. FHKCX (38.74). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. OBCHX (-44.08).
| FHKCX | OBCHX | FHKCX / OBCHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.80 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.16 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.265 | 41.655 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 53.2M | 3,408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.50 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 43.44 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.35 | 46.64 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | -44.08 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.42 | -24.68 | -362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement