Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs RBCRX
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs RBCRX
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.58
Change-$0.58 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.63
Change-$0.17 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67M
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. RBCRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. RBCRX (6.67M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: RBCRX (1.35) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKCX (30 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKCX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.93 vs. FHKCX (38.74).
| FHKCX | RBCRX | FHKCX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.00 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 6.74 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.265 | 50.588 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 6.67M | 27,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.35 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 45.93 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.35 | 54.75 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.42 | 34.46 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement