Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs RBCRX
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs RBCRX
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.30
Change+$0.56 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$10.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51M
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. RBCRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and RBCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. RBCRX (5.51M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: RBCRX (1.68) vs FHKCX (1.17). FHKCX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKCX (30 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKCX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX (37.39) and FHKCX (35.79) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FHKCX | RBCRX | FHKCX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.00 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 6.88 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.185 | 24.353 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 5.51M | 23,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.68 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.79 | 37.39 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 16.96 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.90 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.00 | 9.47 | 538% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement