Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs FHKTX
FHKIX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs FHKTX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$56.00
Change+$0.26 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$55.01
Change+$0.26 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FHKIX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX (1.6B) and FHKTX (1.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKIX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: FHKIX (1.02) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKIX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: FHKIX (17 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKIX (30.00) and FHKTX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKIX (0) and FHKTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKIX (32.10) and FHKTX (31.39) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.01 vs. FHKTX (16.51).
| FHKIX | FHKTX | FHKIX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.43 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.43 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.153 | 44.573 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 1.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.78 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.10 | 31.39 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.17 | 91.00 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.01 | 16.51 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.79 | 104.70 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement