Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAFX
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$46.93
Change+$0.55 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.23M
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAFX (36.2M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAFX (1.36) vs FHKIX (1.21). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.78 vs. FHKIX (35.82). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.82 vs. GSAFX (-28.57).
| FHKIX | GSAFX | FHKIX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.218 | 19.480 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.2M | 3,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.82 | 39.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.06 | 2.17 | 2,078% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.82 | -28.57 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement