Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAFX
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.17
Change-$0.57 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.92
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.95M
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAFX (40.9M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAFX (1.20) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.74 vs. GSAFX (31.96). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.49 vs. GSAFX (-30.24).
| FHKIX | GSAFX | FHKIX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.295 | 32.388 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.9M | 4,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 31.96 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.41 | 32.90 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.49 | -30.24 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement