Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAGX
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$52.95
Change-$0.22 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$25.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.82M
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAGX (40.8M). GSAGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAGX (1.05) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.75 vs. GSAGX (31.17). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.31 vs. GSAGX (-33.02).
| FHKIX | GSAGX | FHKIX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.30 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.818 | 31.598 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.8M | 4,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.75 | 31.17 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.49 | 31.11 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | -33.02 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.94 | 29.66 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement