Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAGX
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.83
Change-$0.49 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$27.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32M
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSAGX (42.3M). FHKIX (1.02) and GSAGX (1.01) have matching dividends . FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.16 vs. GSAGX (25.29). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. GSAGX (-24.19).
| FHKIX | GSAGX | FHKIX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.30 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.712 | 39.510 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 42.3M | 3,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.01 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.16 | 25.29 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.89 | 39.54 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | -24.19 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.02 | 41.25 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement