Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAIX
FHKIX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$48.31
Change-$0.48 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$26.26
Change-$0.59 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
FHKIX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAIX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAIX (37.7M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAIX (1.35) vs FHKIX (1.21). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.37 vs. FHKIX (36.12). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.24 vs. GSAIX (-28.21).
| FHKIX | GSAIX | FHKIX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.10 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.94 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.464 | 26.412 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 37.7M | 3,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.35 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.12 | 42.37 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.60 | 8.48 | 609% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | -28.21 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.83 | 38.57 | 235% |