Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs HSHCX
FHKIX vs HSHCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HSHCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Hartford Schroders China A C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.07 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
FHKIX vs HSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. HSHCX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and HSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HSHCX (17.3M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HSHCX: FHKIX (1.27) vs HSHCX (0.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HSHCX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HSHCX (5 years). HSHCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHCX: FHKIX (0) vs HSHCX (2000). HSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.30 vs. FHKIX (19.56). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.51 vs. HSHCX (-17.02).
| FHKIX | HSHCX | FHKIX / HSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.25 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.84 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.604 | 5.405 | 289% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 17.3M | 7,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.56 | 23.30 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.31 | -21.42 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.51 | -17.02 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement