Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs ICHKX
FHKIX vs ICHKX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs ICHKX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$49.32
Change+$1.00 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$15.59
Change+$0.28 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.56M
FHKIX vs ICHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. ICHKX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and ICHKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ICHKX (26.6M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: FHKIX (1.15) vs ICHKX (0.90). FHKIX was incepted earlier than ICHKX: FHKIX (17 years) vs ICHKX (31 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ICHKX (8.63). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: FHKIX (0) vs ICHKX (5000). FHKIX (40.93) and ICHKX (40.43) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.59 vs. ICHKX (-31.90).
| FHKIX | ICHKX | FHKIX / ICHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.94 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.94 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 22.370 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 26.6M | 5,207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.90 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.93 | 40.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.06 | 5.91 | 1,033% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.59 | -31.90 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.41 | -15.94 | -605% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement