Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs LNGZX
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.17
Change-$0.57 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.24
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.9M
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. LNGZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LNGZX (50.9M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKIX (1.00) vs LNGZX (0.91). FHKIX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKIX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKIX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.75 vs. LNGZX (30.57). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.31 vs. LNGZX (-39.52).
| FHKIX | LNGZX | FHKIX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.818 | 29.048 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 50.9M | 3,562% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.75 | 30.57 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.49 | 29.35 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | -39.52 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.94 | 21.38 | 407% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement