Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs LNGZX
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.24
Change-$0.48 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$50.26
Change-$0.58 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.56M
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LNGZX (54.6M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKIX (1.15) vs LNGZX (0.96). FHKIX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKIX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKIX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX (31.81) and FHKIX (31.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.96 vs. LNGZX (-28.34).
| FHKIX | LNGZX | FHKIX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.999 | 36.317 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 54.6M | 2,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.96 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.56 | 31.81 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.66 | 36.45 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.96 | -28.34 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.72 | 47.07 | 242% |