Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs LNGZX
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$45.33
Change-$0.68 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.83
Change-$0.82 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.95M
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. LNGZX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. LNGZX (46.9M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKIX (1.21) vs LNGZX (1.03). FHKIX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKIX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKIX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.62 vs. FHKIX (29.93). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.01 vs. LNGZX (-36.69).
| FHKIX | LNGZX | FHKIX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.496 | 16.165 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 46.9M | 2,783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.03 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.93 | 33.62 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 2.41 | 1,791% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.01 | -36.69 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.63 | 6.18 | 852% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement