Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$51.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCHFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MCHFX (456M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.42) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.71 vs. MCHFX (25.05). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. MCHFX (-33.55).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.241 | 27.307 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 456M | 398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.42 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.71 | 25.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.28 | 26.06 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -33.55 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.62 | -16.45 | -508% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement