Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.04
Change+$1.39 (+3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Matthews China Investor
Price$15.11
Change+$0.12 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.39M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. MCHFX (359M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.82) vs FHKIX (1.37). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCHFX (27 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.48 vs. FHKIX (20.25). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.78 vs. MCHFX (-27.81).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.152 | 11.533 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 359M | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.82 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.25 | 27.48 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.98 | -13.02 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.78 | -27.81 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.96 | -35.00 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement