Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$48.38
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Investor
Price$16.91
Change+$0.22 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCHFX (400M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.62) vs FHKIX (1.21). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.61 vs. FHKIX (35.90). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.24 vs. MCHFX (-31.68).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.220 | 24.182 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 400M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.62 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.90 | 53.61 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.19 | 10.45 | 490% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.24 | -31.68 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.87 | -7.91 | -1,149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers