Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.83
Change-$0.49 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Investor
Price$18.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MCHFX (475M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.39) vs FHKIX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.16 vs. MCHFX (19.60). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. MCHFX (-24.21).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.712 | 37.649 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 475M | 336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.39 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.16 | 19.60 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.89 | 42.33 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | -24.21 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.02 | -4.78 | -2,157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement