Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$52.95
Change-$0.22 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MICDX (99.3M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.93) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.75 vs. MICDX (33.30). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.31 vs. MICDX (-6.68).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.818 | 31.065 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 99.3M | 1,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.93 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.75 | 33.30 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.49 | 29.64 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | -6.68 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.94 | 38.59 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement