Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.83
Change-$0.49 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICDX (104M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.87) vs FHKIX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.35 vs. MICDX (14.34). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.68 vs. MICDX (2.02).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.982 | 35.123 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 104M | 1,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 2.87 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.35 | 14.34 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.65 | 40.55 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 2.02 | 827% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.80 | 50.34 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement