Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICFX
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.55
Change+$0.25 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICFX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MICFX (456M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICFX (1.51) vs FHKIX (1.04). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKIX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.36 vs. MICFX (28.93). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : -0.08 vs. MICFX (-31.76).
| FHKIX | MICFX | FHKIX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.802 | 30.253 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 456M | 381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.36 | 28.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.85 | 23.41 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.08 | -31.76 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.74 | -12.83 | -715% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement