Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$45.90
Change+$0.47 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$39.46
Change+$0.18 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.98M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a StrongBuy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. NGCAX (48M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKIX (1.27) vs NGCAX (0.96). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.39 vs. FHKIX (23.61). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.01 vs. NGCAX (-35.18).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.755 | 18.135 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 48M | 2,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.61 | 29.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.96 | -2.53 | -1,498% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.01 | -35.18 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.76 | -1.35 | -3,158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement