Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.17
Change-$0.57 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.81
Change-$0.31 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.27M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. NGCAX (51.3M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKIX (1.00) vs NGCAX (0.83). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.74 vs. NGCAX (30.01). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.49 vs. NGCAX (-39.47).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.295 | 28.752 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 51.3M | 3,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.83 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.74 | 30.01 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.41 | 28.35 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.49 | -39.47 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.94 | 17.43 | 510% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement