Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$42.29
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$37.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.32M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. NGCAX (47.3M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKIX (1.37) vs NGCAX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. FHKIX (15.62). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.84 vs. NGCAX (-29.27).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.461 | 14.617 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 47.3M | 2,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.00 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.62 | 18.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.22 | -8.02 | -290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.84 | -29.27 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.62 | -9.80 | -190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement