Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.83
Change-$0.49 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$46.52
Change-$0.60 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.79M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. NGCAX (56.8M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKIX (1.02) vs NGCAX (0.79). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.35 vs. NGCAX (19.27). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.68 vs. NGCAX (-31.17).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.982 | 41.714 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 56.8M | 2,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.79 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.35 | 19.27 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.65 | 42.79 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | -31.17 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.80 | 35.05 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement