Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$38.50
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.49M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. NGCAX (47.5M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKIX (1.37) vs NGCAX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). NGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.77 vs. FHKIX (21.84). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.80 vs. NGCAX (-30.00).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.852 | 16.271 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 47.5M | 2,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.00 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.84 | 26.77 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | -10.07 | -281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | -30.00 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.48 | -5.80 | -491% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement