Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GMEPX
FHKTX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GMEPX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$50.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.11
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.26M
FHKTX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GMEPX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GMEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GMEPX (39.3M). GMEPX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GMEPX (1.25) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GMEPX (7 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX (0) and GMEPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.06 vs. FHKTX (46.09). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.14 vs. GMEPX (-20.64).
| FHKTX | GMEPX | FHKTX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.09 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.745 | 32.845 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.3M | 3,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.09 | 53.06 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.21 | 22.47 | 304% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.14 | -20.64 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement