Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAEX
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$51.98
Change-$0.21 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$27.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.82M
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAEX (40.8M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAEX (1.15) vs FHKTX (0.77). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FHKTX (18 years) vs GSAEX (12 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.00 vs. GSAEX (31.51). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.63 vs. GSAEX (-31.67).
| FHKTX | GSAEX | FHKTX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.162 | 31.833 | 117% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 40.8M | 4,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.00 | 31.51 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.56 | 32.14 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.63 | -31.67 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.58 | 34.48 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement