Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAEX
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.22M
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAEX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSAEX (41.2M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAEX (1.10) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSAEX (12 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.72 vs. GSAEX (30.67). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.19 vs. GSAEX (-26.09).
| FHKTX | GSAEX | FHKTX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.340 | 34.533 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 41.2M | 3,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.10 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.72 | 30.67 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.93 | 39.09 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.19 | -26.09 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.86 | 38.59 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement