Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs HLMCX
FHKTX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$55.32
Change+$0.31 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.63M
FHKTX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. HLMCX (3.63M). HLMCX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: HLMCX (0.88) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKTX (17 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKTX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKTX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.68 vs. HLMCX (13.16).
| FHKTX | HLMCX | FHKTX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.16 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 4.12 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.573 | 31.509 | 141% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 3.63M | 44,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.68 | 13.16 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.20 | 23.09 | 421% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement