Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MCHFX
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$50.81
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MCHFX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MCHFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MCHFX (456M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MCHFX (1.42) vs FHKTX (0.77). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKTX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKTX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.00 vs. MCHFX (25.05). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -5.15 vs. MCHFX (-33.55).
| FHKTX | MCHFX | FHKTX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.614 | 27.307 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 456M | 398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.42 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.00 | 25.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.45 | 26.06 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.15 | -33.55 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.33 | -16.45 | -476% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement