Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MICDX
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$54.84
Change-$0.48 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MICDX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICDX (104M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MICDX (2.87) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKTX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.67 vs. MICDX (14.34). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. MICDX (2.02).
| FHKTX | MICDX | FHKTX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.388 | 35.123 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 104M | 1,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 2.87 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.67 | 14.34 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.31 | 40.55 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | 2.02 | 658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.87 | 50.34 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement