Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MICFX
FHKTX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$54.84
Change-$0.48 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Instl
Price$18.49
Change-$0.18 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
FHKTX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MICFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICFX (475M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MICFX (1.43) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MICFX (15 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKTX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.67 vs. MICFX (9.37). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. MICFX (-22.41).
| FHKTX | MICFX | FHKTX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.12 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.12 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.388 | 39.121 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 475M | 336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.43 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.67 | 9.37 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.31 | 44.17 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | -22.41 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.87 | -2.55 | -3,873% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement