Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MICFX
FHKTX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$46.53
Change+$0.68 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Instl
Price$16.25
Change+$0.32 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
FHKTX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MICFX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICFX (400M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MICFX (1.66) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MICFX (15 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKTX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.81 vs. FHKTX (30.51). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.61 vs. MICFX (-29.77).
| FHKTX | MICFX | FHKTX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.12 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.12 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.499 | 18.703 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 400M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 42.81 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.11 | 4.24 | 969% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.61 | -29.77 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.74 | -20.45 | -263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement