Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLSX vs OICAX
FHLSX vs OICAX Comparison
Open Charts FHLSX vs OICAX
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$11.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.38M
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth A
Price$13.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
FHLSX vs OICAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLSX vs. OICAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLSX is a Hold and OICAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OICAX has more cash in the bank: 4.21B vs. FHLSX (67.4M). OICAX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: OICAX (3.20) vs FHLSX (2.78). FHLSX was incepted earlier than OICAX: FHLSX (6 years) vs OICAX (29 years). OICAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.49). FHLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. OICAX (11.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than OICAX: FHLSX (0) vs OICAX (500). FHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. OICAX (6.53). FHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. OICAX (11.15).
| FHLSX | OICAX | FHLSX / OICAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.496 | 8.746 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.4M | 4.21B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 3.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 6.53 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 20.90 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.13 | 11.15 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement